United States v. Walker

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 5, 2000·No. 00-6257·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6257

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LLOYD LENWOOD WALKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-84, CA-98-779-7)

Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 5, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd Lenwood Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Lloyd Lenwood Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Walker, Nos. CR-95-84;

CA-98-779-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Walker, (4th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Walker (United States v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related