United States v. Walker

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Walker

70 F. App'x 145

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 30, 2003·No. No. 03-6498·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Fredrick Walker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking to compel the government to file a motion to reduce his sentence under Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Walker, No. CR-97-443 (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2003). Walker’s motion to remand is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Michael Fredrick Walker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking to compel the government to file a motion to reduce his sentence under Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Walker, No. CR-97-443 (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2003). Walker’s motion to remand is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Walker, 70 F. App'x 145 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

70 F. App'x 145 (United States v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.