United States v. Vural

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 19, 2009·No. 09-6111·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6111

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BEKIR VURAL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:90-cr-00139-5)

Submitted: June 4, 2009 Decided: June 19, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bekir Vural, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente, Acting United States Attorney, Erik R. Barnett, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bekir Vural has filed a second notice of appeal from

his criminal judgment entered in 1990. As our previous decision

in No. 91-5630 affirmed the judgment, we dismiss the present

appeal of that same judgment as duplicative. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Vural, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Vural (United States v. Vural) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.