United States v. Vural

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Vural

326 F. App'x 698

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 19, 2009·No. No. 09-6111·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bekir Vural has filed a second notice of appeal from his criminal judgment entered in 1990. As our previous decision in No. 91-5630 affirmed the judgment, we dismiss the present appeal of that same judgment as duplicative. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bekir Vural has filed a second notice of appeal from his criminal judgment entered in 1990. As our previous decision in No. 91-5630 affirmed the judgment, we dismiss the present appeal of that same judgment as duplicative. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Vural, 326 F. App'x 698 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

326 F. App'x 698 (United States v. Vural) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.