United States v. Vural
This text of United States v. Vural (United States v. Vural) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6111
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BEKIR VURAL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:90-cr-00139-5)
Submitted: June 4, 2009 Decided: June 19, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bekir Vural, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente, Acting United States Attorney, Erik R. Barnett, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Bekir Vural has filed a second notice of appeal from
his criminal judgment entered in 1990. As our previous decision
in No. 91-5630 affirmed the judgment, we dismiss the present
appeal of that same judgment as duplicative. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Vural, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-vural-ca4-2009.