United States v. Vural

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Vural

239 F. App'x 836

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 7, 2007·No. Nos. 07-6287, 07-6709·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Bekir Vural appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the district court. See United States v. Vural, No. 1:90-cr-00139-AVB (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 31, 2007 & entered Feb. 2, 2007; filed & entered Apr. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Bekir Vural appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the district court. See United States v. Vural, No. 1:90-cr-00139-AVB (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 31, 2007 & entered Feb. 2, 2007; filed & entered Apr. 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Vural, 239 F. App'x 836 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

239 F. App'x 836 (United States v. Vural) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.