United States v. Vural

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 7, 2007·No. 07-6287·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6287

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BEKIR VURAL,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 07-6709

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:90-cr-00139-AVB)

Submitted: August 24, 2007 Decided: September 7, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bekir Vural, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Bekir Vural appeals the

district court’s orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motions.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the district court. See

United States v. Vural, No. 1:90-cr-00139-AVB (E.D. Va. filed

Jan. 31, 2007 & entered Feb. 2, 2007; filed & entered Apr. 26,

2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Vural, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Vural (United States v. Vural) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.