United States v. Vural
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6287
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
BEKIR VURAL,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 07-6709
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:90-cr-00139-AVB)
Submitted: August 24, 2007 Decided: September 7, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bekir Vural, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Bekir Vural appeals the
district court’s orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motions.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the district court. See
United States v. Vural, No. 1:90-cr-00139-AVB (E.D. Va. filed
Jan. 31, 2007 & entered Feb. 2, 2007; filed & entered Apr. 26,
2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Vural (United States v. Vural) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.