United States v. Usdc-Nvr

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 29, 2015
Docket14-71408
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Usdc-Nvr (United States v. Usdc-Nvr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Usdc-Nvr, (9th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 29 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-71408

D.C. No. 3:73-cv-00127-RCJ- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WGC

Petitioner, MEMORANDUM* v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO,

Respondent,

WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT; et al.,

Real Parties in Interest.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Argued January 16, 2015 and Submitted June 29, 2015 San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, M. SMITH, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

The petition of the United States for a writ of mandamus to the district court

is denied without prejudice in light of the opinion handed down in United States v.

U.S. District Court, No. 14-70486.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Usdc-Nvr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-usdc-nvr-ca9-2015.