United States v. Usdc-Nvr
This text of United States v. Usdc-Nvr (United States v. Usdc-Nvr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 29 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-71408
D.C. No. 3:73-cv-00127-RCJ- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WGC
Petitioner, MEMORANDUM* v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO,
Respondent,
WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT; et al.,
Real Parties in Interest.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Argued January 16, 2015 and Submitted June 29, 2015 San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, M. SMITH, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
The petition of the United States for a writ of mandamus to the district court
is denied without prejudice in light of the opinion handed down in United States v.
U.S. District Court, No. 14-70486.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Usdc-Nvr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-usdc-nvr-ca9-2015.