Ex parte Fahey

Supreme Court

Ex parte Fahey

331 U.S. 783

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 14, 1947

DocketNo. 133,

StatusPublished

This text of 331 U.S. 783 (Ex parte Fahey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ex parte Fahey, 331 U.S. 783 (1947).

Pincite

Opinion

A rule is ordered to issue, returnable Monday, April 28, next, requiring the respondents to show cause why leave to file the petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and/or injunction should not be granted. The cause is assigned for argument on the return to the rule immediately following the hearing in Fahey v. Mal-lonee, No. 687. All proceedings tending to effectuate the order of the District Judge granting a motion with respect to costs and expenses of certain appellees in case No. 687 and counsel fees are hereby stayed pending the further order of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A rule is ordered to issue, returnable Monday, April 28, next, requiring the respondents to show cause why leave to file the petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and/or injunction should not be granted. The cause is assigned for argument on the return to the rule immediately following the hearing in Fahey v. Mal-lonee, No. 687. All proceedings tending to effectuate the order of the District Judge granting a motion with respect to costs and expenses of certain appellees in case No. 687 and counsel fees are hereby stayed pending the further order of this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

331 U.S. 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-fahey-scotus-1947.