United States v. Toby C. Patterson

406 F.3d 1095, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 7854, 2005 WL 1052674
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 6, 2005·No. 00-30306·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinions

ORDER: Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD.

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel, rehearing, with Judge Tallman voting to grant it. Judge Tallman votes to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. Judges Noonan and Tashima recommend that the petition for rehearing en banc be denied. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, but the matter failed to receive a majority of th.e votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc rehearing.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Toby C. Patterson, 406 F.3d 1095, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 7854, 2005 WL 1052674 (9th Cir. 2005).

406 F.3d 1095 (United States v. Toby C. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Thoen
2024 Ohio 5720 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2024)
United States v. Slape
Fifth Circuit, 2022
United States v. Brune
991 F.3d 652 (Fifth Circuit, 2021)
People v. Guillen
2014 IL App (2d) 131216 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2015)
State v. Castro
2014 Ohio 2398 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
Haynes v. State
2012 WY 151 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2012)
James Fox v. Charles L. Ryan
462 F. App'x 730 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
State v. Thomas
995 A.2d 65 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2010)
State v. Shannon Bullplume
2009 MT 145 (Montana Supreme Court, 2009)
United States v. Meza-Ortiz
231 F. App'x 709 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Bryson Jose Roberto A. Miguel
425 F.3d 1237 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Jose
Ninth Circuit, 2005
United States v. Toby C. Patterson
406 F.3d 1095 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)