United States v. Toby C. Patterson
This text of 406 F.3d 1095 (United States v. Toby C. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER: Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD.
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel, rehearing, with Judge Tallman voting to grant it. Judge Tallman votes to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. Judges Noonan and Tashima recommend that the petition for rehearing en banc be denied. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, but the matter failed to receive a majority of th.e votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc rehearing.
The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
406 F.3d 1095, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 7854, 2005 WL 1052674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-toby-c-patterson-ca9-2005.