United States v. Sumrel
This text of 8 C.M.A. 399 (United States v. Sumrel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
In spite of his plea of not guilty, the accused was convicted of desertion for an unauthorized absence of five months germinated by surrender. The law officer, over defense objection, instructed the court that: “if the condition of ■absence without proper authority is much prolonged and there is no satisfactory- explanation of it, the court will be justified in inferring from that alone an intent to remain absent permanently.” Substantially the same instruction has been held prejudicially erroneous in United States v Cothern, 8 USCMA 158, 23 CMR 382, and United States v [400]*400Burgess, 8 USCMA 168, 23 CMR 387. For the reasons expressed in those opinions, the accused’s conviction must be reversed. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review. The board may, in its discretion, approve the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence or it may order a rehearing on the desertion charge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 C.M.A. 399, 8 USCMA 399, 24 C.M.R. 209, 1957 CMA LEXIS 349, 1957 WL 4743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-sumrel-cma-1957.