United States v. Dotstry

8 C.M.A. 488, 8 USCMA 488, 24 C.M.R. 298, 1957 CMA LEXIS 316, 1957 WL 4766
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedDecember 13, 1957
DocketNo. 10,149
StatusPublished

This text of 8 C.M.A. 488 (United States v. Dotstry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Dotstry, 8 C.M.A. 488, 8 USCMA 488, 24 C.M.R. 298, 1957 CMA LEXIS 316, 1957 WL 4766 (cma 1957).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The issue here presented has been decided in appellant’s favor by the cases of United States v Cothern, 8 USCMA 158, 23 CMR 382, and United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287. For the reasons stated in those opinions, the conviction must be set aside. The decision of the board of review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review. The board, in its discretion, may approve the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence or it may order a rehearing on the principal charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Latimer, Judge (concurring in the result) :

I concur in the result only for the reason set forth in United States v Sumrel, 8 USCMA 399, 24 CMR 209 (concurring opinion).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Cothern
8 C.M.A. 158 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
United States v. Sumrel
8 C.M.A. 399 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
United States v. Soccio
8 C.M.A. 477 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 C.M.A. 488, 8 USCMA 488, 24 C.M.R. 298, 1957 CMA LEXIS 316, 1957 WL 4766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dotstry-cma-1957.