United States v. Thomas

8 C.M.A. 487, 8 USCMA 487, 24 C.M.R. 297, 1957 CMA LEXIS 315, 1957 WL 4765
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 C.M.A. 92
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided December 13, 1957·No. No. 10,118·Published

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

HOMER FERGUSON, Judge:

The issue presented in this case is the same as that decided by the Court in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287, and United States v Cothern, 8 USCMA 158, 23 CMR 382. For the reasons stated in those opinions, the accused’s conviction of the two offenses of desertion must be set aside. The record is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for reference to a board of review. The board, in its discretion, may affirm the lesser offenses of absence without leave and reassess the sentence, or it may order a rehearing on the desertion charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Thomas, 8 C.M.A. 487, 8 USCMA 487, 24 C.M.R. 297, 1957 CMA LEXIS 315, 1957 WL 4765 (cma 1957).

8 C.M.A. 487 (United States v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Cothern
8 C.M.A. 158 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
United States v. Sumrel
8 C.M.A. 399 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
United States v. Soccio
8 C.M.A. 477 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)