United States v. Linkey

8 C.M.A. 492, 8 USCMA 492, 24 C.M.R. 302, 1957 CMA LEXIS 320, 1957 WL 4770
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedDecember 13, 1957
DocketNo. 10,281
StatusPublished

This text of 8 C.M.A. 492 (United States v. Linkey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Linkey, 8 C.M.A. 492, 8 USCMA 492, 24 C.M.R. 302, 1957 CMA LEXIS 320, 1957 WL 4770 (cma 1957).

Opinion

[493]*493Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The desertion instruction found in the instant case has been condemned in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287. For the reasons stated in that opinion the accused’s conviction of desertion in specifications 1 and 2 of Charge I must be set aside. The decision of the board of review is reversed and the record returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for further reference to a board of review. The board, in its discretion, may approve the lesser offenses of absence without leave and reassess the entire sentence on the basis of the remaining approved findings of guilt, or it may order a rehearing on the desertion charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Latimer, Judge

(concurring in the result) :

I concur in the result solely for the reason expressed in United States v Sumrel, 8 USCMA 399, 24 CMR 209 (concurring opinion).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Sumrel
8 C.M.A. 399 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)
United States v. Soccio
8 C.M.A. 477 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 C.M.A. 492, 8 USCMA 492, 24 C.M.R. 302, 1957 CMA LEXIS 320, 1957 WL 4770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-linkey-cma-1957.