United States v. Singleton

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Singleton. Read the opinion of the Court — 232 F. App'x 313
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 15, 2009·No. 09-6791·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6791

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CARL JEROME SINGLETON, a/k/a Ronald Keith Stuart, a/k/a Wallace Owens,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (2:90-cr-00015-JAB-1)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Jerome Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Carl Jerome Singleton appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Singleton, No. 2:90-cr-

00015-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Singleton, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Singleton (United States v. Singleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related