United States v. Singleton

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Singleton. Read the opinion of the Court — 178 F. App'x 259
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2008·No. 08-6005·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6005

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JONATHON CRAIG SINGLETON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (1:05-cr-00030-jpj-pms-2)

Submitted: September 30, 2008 Decided: October 20, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathon Craig Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jonathon Craig Singleton appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion to amend his fine payment schedule

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3572(d)(3) (2000). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Singleton, No. 1:05-cr-00030-jpj-pms-2 (W.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2007).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Singleton, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Singleton (United States v. Singleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related