United States v. Singleton

276 F. App'x 317
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Singleton. Read the opinion of the Court — 178 F. App'x 259
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 9, 2008·No. 08-6005·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Singleton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to defer payment of his criminal fine. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); United *318 States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).

The district court entered its order on October 19, 2007. Singleton filed the notice of appeal on November 18, 2007, * after the ten-day period expired but within the thirty-day excusable neglect period. Because the notice of appeal was filed within the excusable neglect period, we remand the case to the district court for the court to determine whether Singleton has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the ten-day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED.

*

For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Singleton, 276 F. App'x 317 (4th Cir. 2008).

276 F. App'x 317 (United States v. Singleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houston v. Lack
487 U.S. 266 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Jose v. Reyes
759 F.2d 351 (Fourth Circuit, 1985)