United States v. Ryan Little

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ryan Little. Read the opinion of the Court — 455 F. App'x 315
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 22, 2013·No. 12-8155·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8155

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RYAN O’NEIL LITTLE, a/k/a LA, a/k/a Youngblood,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:95-cr-00105-MOC-1)

Submitted: July 18, 2013 Decided: July 22, 2013

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ryan O’Neil Little, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ryan O’Neil Little appeals the district court’s order

granting in part and denying in part Little’s motion to remove

the district court’s previous order denying relief under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Little,

No. 3:95-cr-00105-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 2012). We further

deny Little’s motion for return of all materials and property

held by USP Lee County. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ryan Little, (4th Cir. 2013).

United States v. Ryan Little (United States v. Ryan Little) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related