United States v. Ryan Little

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ryan Little

455 F. App'x 315

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 23, 2011·No. 11-6828·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*316 PER CURIAM:

Ryan O’Neil Little appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Little, No. 3:95-cr-00105-MOC-l (W.D.N.C. June 15, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*316 PER CURIAM:

Ryan O’Neil Little appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Little, No. 3:95-cr-00105-MOC-l (W.D.N.C. June 15, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Ryan Little, 455 F. App'x 315 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

455 F. App'x 315 (United States v. Ryan Little) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related