United States v. Ryan Little

455 F. App'x 303
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ryan Little. Read the opinion of the Court — 455 F. App'x 315
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 23, 2011·No. 11-7132·Unpublished

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ryan O’Neil Little appeals the district court’s order denying various motions in his criminal case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Little, No. 3:95-cr-00105-MOC-1 (W.D.N.C. July 22, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ryan Little, 455 F. App'x 303 (4th Cir. 2011).

455 F. App'x 303 (United States v. Ryan Little) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.