United States v. Rolle

185 F. App'x 228
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rolle. Read the opinion of the Court — 163 F. App'x 245
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2006·No. No. 06-6450·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Troy Rolle appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). Amendment 506 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, upon which Rolle’s motion relies, has been superseded by Amendment 567 in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. LaBonte, 520 U.S. 751, 117 S.Ct. 1673, 137 L.Ed.2d 1001 (1997). See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual App. C amends. 506, 567 (1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rolle, 185 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2006).

185 F. App'x 228 (United States v. Rolle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. LaBonte
520 U.S. 751 (Supreme Court, 1997)