United States v. Rolle

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Rolle

128 F. App'x 331

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rolle. Read the opinion of the Court — 163 F. App'x 245 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 6, 2005·No. 05-6149·Unpublished

Opinion

*332 PER CURIAM:

Troy Rolle appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp.2004) and his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Rolle, No. CR-97-608 (D.S.C. Jan. 6, 2005). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*332 PER CURIAM:

Troy Rolle appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp.2004) and his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Rolle, No. CR-97-608 (D.S.C. Jan. 6, 2005). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Rolle, 128 F. App'x 331 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

128 F. App'x 331 (United States v. Rolle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related