United States v. Rolle

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6450

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TROY ROLLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (7:97-cr-00608-HMH)

Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 21, 2006

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Troy Rolle, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Troy Rolle appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2000). Amendment 506 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines,

upon which Rolle’s motion relies, has been superseded by Amendment

567 in response to the Supreme Court's decision in United States v.

LaBonte, 520 U.S. 751 (1997). See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines

Manual App. C amends. 506, 567 (1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -