United States v. Rodriguez
This text of United States v. Rodriguez (United States v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 21-10418 Document: 00516159688 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/10/2022
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED January 10, 2022 No. 21-10418 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Jonathan Rodriguez,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 4:20-CR-339-4
Before Smith, Stewart, and Graves, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:*
The attorney appointed to represent Jonathan Rodriguez has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and relevant portions of
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opin- ion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-10418 Document: 00516159688 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/10/2022
No. 21-10418
the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to with- draw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rodriguez-ca5-2022.