United States v. Rodriguez-Flores

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2023·No. 23-40149·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 23-40149 Document: 00516920205 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/04/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 23-40149

FILED

October 4, 2023

Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Eusebio Rodriguez-Flores,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:19-CR-2203-28

Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Eusebio Rodriguez-Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Flores has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

*

This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 23-40149 Document: 00516920205 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/04/2023

No. 23-40149

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rodriguez-Flores, (5th Cir. 2023).

United States v. Rodriguez-Flores (United States v. Rodriguez-Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)