United States v. Hernandez
This text of United States v. Hernandez (United States v. Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 21-50061 Document: 00516154560 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/05/2022
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED January 5, 2022 No. 21-50061 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Jeremias Santiago Hernandez,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:09-CR-216-4
Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Jeremias Santiago Hernandez, federal prisoner # 39692-177, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). On appeal, he contends that the district court failed to weigh all the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and did not take
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-50061 Document: 00516154560 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/05/2022
No. 21-50061
into consideration all his extraordinary and compelling reasons for a sentence reduction. We review a district court’s decision denying compassionate release for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020). A district court may modify a defendant’s sentence, after considering the applicable § 3553(a) factors, if “extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction” and “such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.” § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). The record reflects that the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that a sentence reduction was not warranted based on its review of the § 3553(a) sentencing factors. Accordingly, the district court’s order is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Hernandez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-hernandez-ca5-2022.