United States v. Redd

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Redd. Read the opinion of the Court — 372 F. App'x 413
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 27, 2011·No. 11-6211·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6211

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DERRICK VINCENT REDD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:97-cr-00006-JCC-1)

Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Vincent Redd, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Andrew Spencer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Derrick Vincent Redd appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) (2006).

We have reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United

States v. Redd, No. 1:97-cr-00006-JCC-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 6, 2011).

We deny Redd’s motion for a stay pending appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Redd, (4th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Redd (United States v. Redd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related