United States v. Redd

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Redd. Read the opinion of the Court — 372 F. App'x 413
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 17, 2009·No. 08-7554·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7554

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DERRICK VINCENT REDD,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-7555

Defendant – Appellant.

No. 08-7642

v. DERRICK VINCENT REDD,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:97-cr-00006-JCC-1)

Submitted: February 25, 2009 Decided: March 17, 2009

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Vincent Redd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Derrick Vincent Redd

appeals district court orders denying his post-conviction

motions for grand jury transcripts, the grand jury concurrence

form and a copy of the form recording the examination done on

the firearm. We affirm.

Redd failed to show any particularized need for any of

the documents. Accordingly, we affirm the district court

orders. We deny his motions for a copy of the transcript at

Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Redd, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Redd (United States v. Redd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.