United States v. Redd

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2006
Docket05-7908
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Redd (United States v. Redd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Redd, (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7908

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DERRICK VINCENT REDD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-6)

Submitted: February 16, 2006 Decided: February 23, 2006

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Vincent Redd, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Andrew Spencer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Derrick Vincent Redd appeals a district court order

denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s order and affirm. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Redd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-redd-ca4-2006.