United States v. Redd
This text of United States v. Redd (United States v. Redd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7908
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DERRICK VINCENT REDD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-6)
Submitted: February 16, 2006 Decided: February 23, 2006
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Vincent Redd, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Andrew Spencer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Derrick Vincent Redd appeals a district court order
denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s order and affirm. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Redd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-redd-ca4-2006.