United States v. Redd

167 F. App'x 973
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2006·No. No. 05-7908·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Derrick Vincent Redd appeals a district court order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Redd, 167 F. App'x 973 (4th Cir. 2006).

167 F. App'x 973 (United States v. Redd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.