United States v. Redd
167 F. App'x 973
Opinion
Derrick Vincent Redd appeals a district court order denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Redd, 167 F. App'x 973 (4th Cir. 2006).
167 F. App'x 973 (United States v. Redd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.