United States v. Redd
This text of United States v. Redd (United States v. Redd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7554
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DERRICK VINCENT REDD,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 08-7555
Defendant – Appellant.
No. 08-7642
v. DERRICK VINCENT REDD,
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:97-cr-00006-JCC-1)
Submitted: February 25, 2009 Decided: March 17, 2009
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Vincent Redd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Derrick Vincent Redd
appeals district court orders denying his post-conviction
motions for grand jury transcripts, the grand jury concurrence
form and a copy of the form recording the examination done on
the firearm. We affirm.
Redd failed to show any particularized need for any of
the documents. Accordingly, we affirm the district court
orders. We deny his motions for a copy of the transcript at
Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Redd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-redd-ca4-2009.