United States v. Redd

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 21, 2011
• Docket: 10-7507
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7507

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DERRICK VINCENT REDD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:97-cr-00006-JCC-1)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 21, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Vincent Redd, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Andrew Spencer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Derrick Vincent Redd appeals a district court order

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2006). We affirm. Because the amendment in question

did not lower Redd’s Guidelines sentence, we find the district

did not abuse its discretion denying the motion. United

States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating

standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED