United States v. Rash

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 3, 2010·No. 10-6309·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6309

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHARLES EMANUEL RASH, a/k/a Chaz, a/k/a Charlie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:01-cr-00025-JPB-DJJ-1)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 3, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Emanuel Rash, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Emanuel Rash appeals the district court’s

orders denying his “Motion for Judicial Recommendation Regarding

Designation for Service of Federal Sentence” and subsequent

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rash,

No. 3:01-cr-00025-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 28 & Feb. 16,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rash, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Rash (United States v. Rash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.