United States v. Rash

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2009·No. 09-7805·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7805

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHARLES EMANUEL RASH, a/k/a Chaz, a/k/a Charlie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:01-cr-00025-JPB-DJJ-1)

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 22, 2009

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Emanuel Rash, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Emanuel Rash appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence, which Rash

styled as a petition for writ of audita querela. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Rash, No. 3:01-cr-00025-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D.W. Va. Sept.

15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rash, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Rash (United States v. Rash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.