United States v. Rash

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Rash

393 F. App'x 997

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 3, 2010·No. No. 10-6309·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Emanuel Rash appeals the district court’s orders denying his “Motion for Judicial Recommendation Regarding Designation for Service of Federal Sentence” and subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rash, No. 3:01-cr-00025-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 28 & Feb. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Emanuel Rash appeals the district court’s orders denying his “Motion for Judicial Recommendation Regarding Designation for Service of Federal Sentence” and subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rash, No. 3:01-cr-00025-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 28 & Feb. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Rash, 393 F. App'x 997 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

393 F. App'x 997 (United States v. Rash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.