United States v. Rash

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Rash

357 F. App'x 542

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2009·No. No. 09-7805·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Emanuel Rash appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence, which Rash styled as a petition for writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm [543]*543for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rash, No. 3:01-cr-00025-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Emanuel Rash appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence, which Rash styled as a petition for writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm [543]*543for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rash, No. 3:01-cr-00025-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Rash, 357 F. App'x 542 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

357 F. App'x 542 (United States v. Rash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.