United States v. Ramos
76 M.J. 131, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 185
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedFebruary 16, 2017
DocketNo. 17-0143/CG
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 76 M.J. 131 (United States v. Ramos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Ramos, 76 M.J. 131, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 185 (Ark. 2017).
Opinion
CCA 1418. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue specified by the Court:
WHETHER APPELLANT WAS ENTITLED TO ARTICLE 31(b), UCMJ, WARNINGS AT ANY POINT DURING HIS INTERROGATION BY CGIS, AND IF SO, WHETHER HE WAS PREJUDICED BY THE ADMISSION OF ANY OF HIS STATEMENTS.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Ramos
76 M.J. 372 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2017)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
76 M.J. 131, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ramos-armfor-2017.