United States v. Phillips

223 F. App'x 249

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Clive Phillips appeals the district court’s order granting his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), and denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Phillips, No. 2:93-cr00131 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 13, 2006; entered Sept. 15, 2006 and filed Nov. 14, 2006; entered Nov. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.