United States v. Phillips

191 F. App'x 229
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Phillips. Read the opinion of the Court — 109 F. App'x 627
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 26, 2006·No. No. 06-6336·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Laron Warren Phillips appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Phillips, Nos. 2:01-cr-00127-JBF; 2:05-cv-637 (E.D.Va. Jan. 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Phillips, 191 F. App'x 229 (4th Cir. 2006).

191 F. App'x 229 (United States v. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.