United States v. Phillips
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6336
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LARON WARREN PHILLIPS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:01-cr-00127-JBF; 2:05-cv-637)
Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 26, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Laron Warren Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Laron Warren Phillips appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to compel a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See United States v. Phillips, Nos. 2:01-cr-00127-JBF;
2:05-cv-637 (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Phillips (United States v. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.