United States v. Perkins
This text of 26 F. App'x 348 (United States v. Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Victor Perkins appeals from the district court's order and judgment dismissing without prejudice his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Perkins v. United States, No. CA-01-509-5-2BR (E .D.N.C. July 27, 2001). Perkins has filed a motion for summary judgment which we deny. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 F. App'x 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-perkins-ca4-2002.