United States v. Perkins

26 F. App'x 348
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Perkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 53 F. App'x 667
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 7, 2002·No. 01-7529·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Victor Perkins appeals from the district court's order and judgment dismissing without prejudice his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Perkins v. United States, No. CA-01-509-5-2BR (E .D.N.C. July 27, 2001). Perkins has filed a motion for summary judgment which we deny. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Perkins, 26 F. App'x 348 (4th Cir. 2002).

26 F. App'x 348 (United States v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241