United States v. Metro Novelty Manufacturing Co.

125 F. Supp. 713, 1954 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2747
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedAugust 27, 1954
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 125 F. Supp. 713 (United States v. Metro Novelty Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Metro Novelty Manufacturing Co., 125 F. Supp. 713, 1954 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2747 (S.D.N.Y. 1954).

Opinion

WALSH, District Judge.

Cross motions are presented for summary judgment. Plaintiff seeks to recover $12,000 damages from defendant for its failure to carry out a $6,000 bid for uniform ornaments. Defendant claims a mistake in the computation of *714 the bid. Plaintiff admits that the error was so gross that it was placed on notice. It further admits that the only consequence of defendant’s failure to perform was the acceptance of the second lowest bid and that there was no damage to the government from the delay in execution which resulted from defendant’s participation in the bidding.

Plaintiff’s purchasing agent sought to avoid the force of Kemp v. United States, D.C.Md.1941, 38 F.Supp. 568, by telephoning the defendant and asking for a “verification” of the bid and by having it “confirmed” by telephone and letter from defendant’s president. Plaintiff, however, did not put defendant on notice of the mistake which it surmised. Reaffirmation of the bid under these circumstances does not bar the defense of rescission.

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caddell Construction Company v. United States
125 Fed. Cl. 30 (Federal Claims, 2016)
Ostman v. St. John's Episcopal Hospital
918 F. Supp. 635 (E.D. New York, 1996)
Ludwig v. NYNEX Service Co.
838 F. Supp. 769 (S.D. New York, 1993)
Carrier Corp. v. United States
32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 72,717 (Court of Claims, 1984)
United States v. Hamilton Enterprises, Inc.
711 F.2d 1038 (Federal Circuit, 1983)
BCM Corp. v. United States
31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,110 (Court of Claims, 1983)
Paragon Energy Corp. v. United States
29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,418 (Court of Claims, 1982)
Wender Presses, Inc. v. The United States
343 F.2d 961 (Court of Claims, 1965)
Universal Transistor Products Corp. v. United States
214 F. Supp. 486 (E.D. New York, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 F. Supp. 713, 1954 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-metro-novelty-manufacturing-co-nysd-1954.