United States v. Marvin Mandel

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Marvin Mandel

609 F.2d 1076, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 10771

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 1, 1979

Docket77-2487 to 77-2492

StatusPublished

Cited by25 cases

This text of 609 F.2d 1076 (United States v. Marvin Mandel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Marvin Mandel, 609 F.2d 1076, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 10771 (4th Cir. 1979).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

Upon consideration of the defendants’ petition for another rehearing before the en banc court, 602 F.2d 653, en banc rehearing of 591 F.2d 1347, and the response of the United States, each of the judges in regular active service who is not disqualified having been polled, and it appearing that fewer than a majority of them have voted for it,

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the petition for another rehearing en banc before the enlarged court be, and it hereby is, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the defendants’ petition for another rehearing before the en banc court, 602 F.2d 653, en banc rehearing of 591 F.2d 1347, and the response of the United States, each of the judges in regular active service who is not disqualified having been polled, and it appearing that fewer than a majority of them have voted for it,

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the petition for another rehearing en banc before the enlarged court be, and it hereby is, denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

609 F.2d 1076, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 10771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-marvin-mandel-ca4-1979.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack