United States v. Lucas

286 F. App'x 41

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gary Michael Lucas appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp.2008). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lucas, No. 2:05-cr-00055-2 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.