United States v. Lucas

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Lucas

180 F. App'x 480

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lucas. Read the opinion of the Court — 322 F. App'x 326 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 22, 2006·No. No. 05-7890·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Rochelle Lucas, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lucas, No. CA-05-293-5 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael Rochelle Lucas, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lucas, No. CA-05-293-5 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Lucas, 180 F. App'x 480 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

180 F. App'x 480 (United States v. Lucas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related