United States v. Lucas
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7890
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL ROCHELLE LUCAS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-293-5)
Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 22, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Rochelle Lucas, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Sue C. Beasley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Michael Rochelle Lucas, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Lucas, No. CA-05-293-5
(E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Lucas (United States v. Lucas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.