United States v. Lucas

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Lucas. Read the opinion of the Court — 322 F. App'x 326
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 22, 2006·No. 05-7890·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7890

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL ROCHELLE LUCAS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-293-5)

Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 22, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Rochelle Lucas, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Sue C. Beasley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael Rochelle Lucas, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Lucas, No. CA-05-293-5

(E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Lucas, (4th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Lucas (United States v. Lucas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241