United States v. Littlejohn

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8187

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

THOMAS FLOYD LITTLEJOHN,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:90-cr-00231-MR-DL)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 24, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Floyd Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thomas Floyd Littlejohn appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion

in denying the motion. See United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d

197, 200 (4th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s order for the reasons stated there. See United

States v. Littlejohn, No. 1:90-cr-00231-MR-DL (W.D.N.C. Aug. 14,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED