United States v. Littlejohn

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6389

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

THOMAS FLOYD LITTLEJOHN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:90-cr-231; 1:05-cv-00249)

Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 6, 2007

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Floyd Littlejohn, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thomas Floyd Littlejohn appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for relief from judgment. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States

v. Littlejohn, Nos. 1:90-cr-231; 1:05-cv-00249 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 12,

2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -