United States v. Littlejohn

384 F. App'x 268
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2010·No. No. 09-8187·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Floyd Littlejohn appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197, 200 (4th Cir.2010). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s [269]*269order for the reasons stated there. See United States v. Littlejohn, No. 1:90-cr-00231-MR-DL (W.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Littlejohn, 384 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2010).

384 F. App'x 268 (United States v. Littlejohn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Stewart
595 F.3d 197 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)