United States v. Littlejohn

202 F. App'x 637
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 10, 2006·No. 06-6836·Unpublished

Opinion

*638 PER CURIAM:

Thomas Floyd Littlejohn appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Littlejohn, No. 1:90-cr-231-5 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Littlejohn, 202 F. App'x 637 (4th Cir. 2006).

202 F. App'x 637 (United States v. Littlejohn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related