United States v. Littlejohn
Opinion
Thomas Floyd Littlejohn appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Littlejohn, No. 1:90-cr-231-5 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
202 F. App'x 637 (United States v. Littlejohn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.